Skip to content


March 10, 2013

One serious question facing all Nigerians today is whether it is helpful or destructive to zone
our country for political leadership. It is a salient challenge, yet it presents such enormous
implications for our national development and existence that the question must be tackled in
a resolute way. The ruling party at the federal level, the People’s Democratic Party (PDP),
has ruled that zoning is their lifeblood, a winning prescription that cannot be done without.
However, we must ask ourselves if zoning is lawful, right, helpful and desirable to our nation
before it stymies or destroys the democratic society we fought hard to win.

Zoning is an undemocratic formula used by political parties to share power according to
loosely-defined geographic ‘zones’ that are neither clearly explained nor sanctioned by the
electorates. It is used to goad the citizens and railroad them into perpetual subservience to
political elites. Zoning has become so tightly integrated into our political structure that it is
being applied to all levels of representation today. A zone could be a ward, a constituency, a
town, a section of a state, an ethnic group, a state or national region, depending on the
office in contention.  The periodic restriction of political opportunity to selected groups in a
political entity, no matter the intention behind it, is dangerous and divisive. It promotes
mediocre performance among the elected, hinders community development and becomes a
catalyst for rigging elections. At this point of our democratic development, our focus should
be on protecting our people and unifying our nation. Our eyes should be centered on
electing people of good character, intelligence, drive, and vision who are prepared to
perform and bring gains of democracy to the people.

As a gubernatorial candidate in Ogun State, I have been confronted by this question and
have never shied away from presenting my views. Those views, which I have shared with my
constituents, have now become so relevant to our national development that I have decided
to challenge people of good conscience at all strata of the society to weigh in on this
question.  Why do I think I should speak openly on zoning at this time? A good leader must
not only enlighten and educate; he must also take positions, comfortable or not, on what he
believes in. That position may not be popular, but those who hide from the truth for the sake
of political correctness are not fit to lead., By this public statement, I am further addressing
this horrible misguidance, not only as an issue in my state but one which currently threatens
our nation.
I will narrow my presentation to four main areas, namely:

·        The danger of zoning;
·        How zoning encourages rigging and other electoral malpractices;
·        Why zoning promotes mediocrity in governance and underdevelopment for the nation
and; How it causes disunity.

Zoning is a Dangerous Political Formula

Zoning is a prescription that kills instead of heals. Our nation, Nigeria, almost fell off the cliff
some weeks ago, but for a quick tweaking of the law by the legislature, after a stubborn
refusal to ensure a smooth transition of presidential powers that the constitution guarantees
by those who maintain, in the ruling party, that power is zoned to President Umaru Yar’Adua’
s region of birth.  These people maintain that power must not change hands even if the
nation stands at the precipice of failure.  The huge hurricane that just missed Nigeria by the
whiskers serves as a warning to people of good conscience to confront the problem now
before it consumes the nation.  Permit me to go back the memory lane to recall how zoning
killed our second democratic experience.

In the Second Republic, there was a gentlemanly agreement within the National Party of
Nigeria (NPN) that when the term of President Shehu Shagari expired, power would travel
from the North to the West.  The intention was to ensure a kind of ‘Federal Character,’ a
supposedly equitable sharing of power among the geographic components of the party.
Chief M. K. O. Abiola, who was eagerly expecting the zoning windfall to fall his way, was a
major financial sponsor of the party.  He supported Alhaji Shehu Shagari not because of his
vision, wisdom, love of the nation and ability to govern. Chief M. K. O, Abiola was not only
denied this zoning windfall, he was humiliated by Umaru Dikko, who claimed the presidency
was not for the highest bidder.  Feeling cheated, Abiola moved against those who used
zoning to bait and punish him.  He left the party and opposed the Shagari administration.
Consequently, the military snuffed life out of democracy.  In 1983, zoning not only failed as a
principle of equity, it contributed to the death of the Second Republic. Those who were
saying ‘North today, South tomorrow’ benefited but the rest of us suffered.

Zoning, which is some kind of “Federal Character”, is being pushed by the same people who
are now against Federal Character. Today, Mr. David Mark, the Senate President and
General Ibrahim Babangida are calling for the abrogation of “Federal Character.”  What a
paradox? The self-confusion and internal conflict among the leadership of the PDP should
tell the nation that zoning is nothing but a self-serving solution whose beneficiaries are its
Suffice to say that General Muhammad Buhari, a Northerner, who emerged as the Head of
State picked General Tunde Idiagbon, also a Northerner, since by their geographic design,
Kwara State is also part of the North. While their administration erred in certain area of
respect of human rights and governance, Nigeria somehow accidentally benefited because
our currency was stronger than what it was under Shagari’s administration, our debt was
reduced and certain sanity was restored in our political life and the country’s economy. This
combination of leadership from the same part of the country provided a focused, serious
and, without doubt, disciplined administration which performed palpably better than the
shared ones before and after it. At the time of the Buhari-Idiagbon administration, we did not
have any cause to complain that the country was being governed by two Northerners and
two Muslims. We were happy with the result of good governance and that is what we should
continue to yearn for today.

While under Buhari-Idiagbon, regime zoning was ignored and a fair government resulted,
the pre-occupation with zoning long before then gave us problems. The zoning system was
the catalyst for Theophilus Danjuma, who shot and killed Major General Aguiyi Ironsi in 1966
to enable his zone to maintain power thus allowing  Yakubu Gowon to mount the saddle of
governance on the back of regionalism. The bullet-riddled bodies of Ironsi and Adekunle
Fajuyi were later found in a nearby forest. So, how does zoning benefit our people, if at all?
Zoning always benefits the cabals. For example, forty four years after Danjuma came to
power, he told the nation that when he made five hundred million dollars from no-bids oil
contract from his former subordinate, Sani Abacha; he did not know what to do with the
money.  Yet my fellow Jukun people and other indigenes of Taraba State have no access to
portable water, good schools and still sleep in darkness. As Plateau State is immersed in
rioting that has rendered thousands homeless, those who gained from zoning and amassed
vast wealth like Danjuma have not considered the plight of my people from that zone. Zoning
only matters when there is a need to gain power, not to help the people they had
represented. General Obasanjo who also benefited from zoning is the highest land owner in
Nigeria today.  He introduced and entrenched the “do or die” electoral process because of


Former President Obasanjo admitted that in 1979, he instrumented the transfer of power to
the north to achieve an illegal wish that he later rationalized. One would have expected that
he would not repeat the same mistake he made in 1979.  Well, oops, he did it again in 2007!
The General violated all the electoral laws when he picked, without restraint, Mr. Umaru Yar’
Adua to lead his political party and Nigeria on the basis of what zone of the nation he hailed
from.  The effect of that arrangement was massive rigging of the election at all levels, which
the beneficiary, Yar’Adua admitted and promised to correct in future elections. Tied to
rigging were numerous litigation, political assassination, and colossal waste of money. It has
been proven time and again that the only way to enforce the zoning system is by rigging
elections, and rigging, we all know presents danger to our democracy and adulterates our
name in the committee of nations.

Once it is the turn of a zone to assume power, what follows is an overriding obligation to find
a visionless individual, to occupy the carved out post. The focus is on the rulers, not the
ruled, the elite, and not the masses. No one brought attention to this issue more than
Obasanjo, who famously said winning was a “do or die” affair in 2007. The PDP had to stay
in power by all means at various political levels because it staged unqualified and
unaccepted leaders in various places in enforcement of its zoning arrangement. The result
was the glorification of political savagery that brought mere thugs into national recognition.


I have decided to be analytical in this portion so that we can all see clearly how long each
“zone” has ruled Nigeria and the measure of benefit on the people of the zone and Nigerians
in general
#Name of President/Head of State        Tenure        Total Time
Sir Abubakar Tafawa Balewa,         October 1, 1960- January 15, 1966        5yrs. 3 months

General Yakubu Gowon         August 1, 1966 – July 29, 1975        9 yrs

General Murtala Mohammed        July 29, 1975 – February 13, 1976        6months

Alhaji Shehu Shagari          October 1, 1979 – December 31, 1983         4years 3 months

General Muhammad Buhari          December 31, 1983 – August 27, 1985        1yr. 8months

General Ibrahim Babangida         August 27, 1985 – August 27, 1993         9yrs.

General Sani Abacha         November 17, 1993 – June 8, 1998        4yrs. 7months

General Abdusalami Abubakar         June 9, 1998 – May 29, 1999        11 months

Alhaji Umaru Yar’Adua         May 29, 2007 – present        3yrs.

TOTAL YEARS IN THE NORTH                 38 years, 2 months

Dr. Nnamdi Azikwe         October 1, 1963 – January 16, 1966        2yrs. 3 months

Major-General Thomas  Aguiyi-Ironsi         January 16, 1966 – July 29, 1966        6 months

General Olusegun  Obasanjo        13 February 1976 – 1 October 1979        3yrs. 7 months

Chief Ernest Shonekan        August 26, 1993 -November 17, 1993        2months 18 days

General Olusegun  Obasanjo        May 29, 1999 – May 29, 2007        8yrs

TOTAL YEARS INTHE SOUTH                 14years, 6 months

It is tragic that while the North has occupied the presidential office for 38 years, there is little
gain to my fellow northerners. With all sense of modesty and decorum, I contend that the
northern Nigeria has been worse than the south. Power did not automatically translate into
development. What power did was to enrich a few in the elite group, who have, in turn, used
the power to further enrich themselves and their offspring. Examined from all angles –
security, education, economy, public utilities, health, and transportation, among others- we
can hardly claim that the north has made any substantial progress over the other parts of
the country. This, my friends, is the sad story of zoning. With over 38 years in power,
General Babangida had to take his wife to a hospital in California, where she died.  With
over 38 years in power, an Air Ambulance has to transport Ya’Adua back from Saudi Arabia
after he sought wellness around the globe for years. When President Yar’Adua appointed
his closest confidants and their cohorts to occupy the Central Bank, Ministry of Finance,
NNPC, Defense, agriculture and other important public offices, some Southerners kicked
against the trend.  In parenthesis, the Southerners who complained forgot that there were
Southerners in the National Assembly who approved the appointment, and instead of
pointing to Nigerians, they pointed to the North because we did not see ourselves as one.

We have to realize that the appointment of mediocre persons to fill these positions is a main
problem of zoning. The sense among the Yar’Adua clan is that this is their time, and they
must make the most of every opportunity. They feel if they fail to “eat”now, the prospect will
soon pass. Zoning places a burden on the beneficiary to use his allocated time to place
his/her own people in strategic positions because the wait will be long for another
opportunity to come.
Nations all over the world look to bring out the best among its people to hold office so that
the fullness of its potentials can be released to address problems and opportunities that
politicians have to resolve or ripen.  Mature democracies ensure that while universal
representation is achieved through geographic delimitation, leadership opportunities are not
restricted to carved-out zones that are not spelled out in the constitution.  Their political
parties never attempt to stifle the law by introducing zoning of political offices that stop
people from seeking elective offices at a particular time. Zoning limits the choice of qualified
persons for political offices to a limited area; thereby sacrificing merit and quality.    A
geographic limit our rulers impose is a limit on our potential for development and change.
This, I vehemently oppose! When a leader sees a problem he thinks he can resolve, and
offers his service to his people, it is a great disservice to block that vision on the platform of
arranged deals which are not sanctioned by the law or the citizens.


Currently, a political quagmire has resulted from the unconstitutional zoning of the
presidency by the ruling PDP to the North.    When the PDP created what it regarded as a
“patriotic” zoning idea, it was myopic in that it did not anticipate incapacitation, infirmity or,
even, death of a president from a particular zone, which could compel the vice president to
assume the duty of the president.  With the Acting President Goodluck Jonathan looking
good to extend his assumption of presidential powers, the Yar’Adua camp and the north are
already claiming rights to eight years of ruling, irrespective of the peaceful transition and the
constitutional role of the acting president. In fact, some reports indicate that a few
northerners believe that if a non-northerner with good programs contests on the platform of
other political party he should not receive the support of the north as a block. If Nigerians
appreciate the programs of such a Southerner contesting on the platform of another political
party and overwhelmingly vote for him, the only way to stop such a person will be by rigging.
This again would deepen disunity. The result will no longer qualify to be called democracy. If
this scenario becomes real, we can expect that assassination will intensify. It will further
embed in our political consciousness dichotomy between the zones and the problem of a
political party will become the problem of a nation.

Man proposes and God disposes. General Obasanjo recently said that it would not have
augured well for him as a Southerner to hand over to another Southerner, even if Nigerians
elected another Southerner (emphasis mine).  Today, divine intervention has altered that
arrangement.   The good luck of the Acting President Jonathan has handed over
presidential powers to the first Southern minority occupier of the seat, even if temporary,
who is the commander in chief of the armed forces as of today. Thus, God, in His infinite
wisdom, has registered his protest against the zoning system that only benefits the powerful,
the rich and divides His people – Nigerians.

As it is in the nation, so it is in Ogun State and other parts of the country. I am bold to say
that there are absolutely no developmental challenges faced by my brethrens from Yewa
that Egun, Ijebus, Aworis or Egbas are not equally experiencing.  This is despite the fact a
Yewa is now the deputy governor and Yewas are at the State House of Assembly, and are
all colluding to oppress the masses. As a matter of fact, even as the current governor
claimed to be from Remo, the great majority of political assassinations and threats of
assassination during his tenure affected the Ijebus, more than any other intra-ethnic
grouping.  Although Gbenga Daniel claims to be an indigene of Sagamu to secure the PDP
gubernatorial ticket, it is now the headquarters of cultism.  It is clear then that zoning is
about the interest of those in power and not the interest of the people. Today, the Egbas
have no access to pipe-borne water, electricity, sound healthcare system, good education
system, just like other sections of the state, despite the fact we have had my people from
Egba in government.

Our system of government in Nigeria today is representative democracy with separation of
powers that allow citizens to delegate power to their supposedly elected officials. Every ward
is represented in a constituency, every constituency is represented in the local government,
every local government is represented in the state government and every state is
represented at the federal level.  This is the constitutional guarantee for representation.  It is
not by zoning.  If zoning were beneficial, it would have been injected in the Constitution. The
Chairman of Odeda Local Government for example, is not from Sagamu.  If he performs well,
he would have established records to use as a leverage to contest for a higher office. This
is what democracy is designed to achieve.

Representation starts from the grassroots to the top, and decision making is not just at the
top. If Ogun State will have the best government, our people will help themselves to pick the
best candidates from the ward level, all the way to the federal level without reference to
ethnics and religion. Each political office should be reserved for the best, including the
governorship. Meaningful change will come only when we entrust power to those we can
vouch for, not only as president or governor, but also as lawmakers and local government
helmsmen. This is how it has worked in the ancient democracies and this is how it should
work for us Nigerians. The governor of Ogun State has the whole state as his constituency.
The governor’s allegiance and interest in the development of the whole state cannot be
zoned, so why should his election be zoned?

It is my belief that the zoning question needs to be addressed sufficiently because of the
way selfish politicians have been programming Nigerians to see it as the way out of
equitable representation.  Genuine democracy does not limit contestants to area of birth
within a local, state, nation or region.  My belief in fair play, equity and justice revolves
around allowing any indigene of any part of Nigeria, as long as that person is constitutionally
qualified, to contest and let the people decide.  If we claim that someone from a geographic
area has already benefited from illegal means of acquiring power, and therefore, no one
from that area should contest again for the next eight years, the basic tenet of democracy is
inherently and irreparably damaged.  In short, that is insanity, unfairness, inequity and
corrosive injustice – not democracy but an adulteration of it.


I am about the unity and an indivisible state under one nation.  If someone from Sagamu is
in a state of coma, and someone from Abeokuta has tried before and he could not bring that
person back to life, and yet another person from Abeokuta has the magic wand to help
resuscitate the dying Sagamu person, it would be plain stupidity to say “no” to the person
with ability. That sick person will just suffer untimely death rather than get the needed lifeline
help. Elections should be based on ability to deliver service and democracy is about letting
the people decide. Further, only hungry and visionless leaders who are out for selfish
political ambition campaign on the basis of ethnicity, division or tribal sentiments.    Many of
our political elite now send their offspring to study and live in the advanced nations such as
United States, Canada, England and Germany. They fail to realize that these nations were
not built on political zoning. The leaders in those countries follow their constitutions, not
parochial party formulas that serve the few. They seek the best to lead.  Nigerian rulers
enjoy what they would not offer to their own people in these civilized countries. We should
stop them. The dream of people everywhere, whether it is in the United States or Nigeria, is
the same – to live a good life, exercise freedom and get justice. We need leaders with good
vision, who can make this dream a reality. When a governor or president is elected, his
activities affect all his or her constituents.  Should I become governor of Ogun State, the
entire 20 local governments and 236 wards become my constituency.  I will be required to
swear an oath of office to care for Ogun State and not my so-called zone, because one day,
after leaving power, I will have cause to travel to other parts of the State for functions.  I also
do not have control over where my children travel to within the state which makes it a must
for me to treat the entire state as my constituents.

Zoning has always been used by the ruling parties in Nigeria as a way of holding the loyalty
of minorities and the less-satisfied – a bait for the fish that otherwise would have sought
deeper waters for its survival.  The dangers of this practice at all levels of political
administration are many.  This is why, I have decided to bring the issue of zoning to the fore
and address it sufficiently, not only for my constituents but for the nation in general.  It is an
important matter that could affect the health of our budding democracy, the overall
development of our nation, and the sanity of our society.  With the experience we are going
through from once an “offshore” president, there is no better time for people of goodwill and
patriots to carefully and intelligently weigh the problems with this practice

I strongly believe that zoning enhances division rather than foster unity.  It divides Nigeria
into regions and tribes, and focuses on our differences.  In a nation, zoning focuses on the
regions; in a state it brings out the units; old affiliations and dialectic problems; in a city,
deep-seething and unresolved disagreements. If we want to build unity, we will wisely do
away with cutting our nation up into fragments that bring division and enhance our
If those destroying Nigeria want to bend on North/South dichotomy, then let them issue me a
Southern Nigerian passport so that I know that I am not totally a Nigerian.

Lanre Banjo
Ogun State Governorship Candidate of the NCP in 2003 and 2007

Lanre Banjo

No comments yet

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: